In new files concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, a draft statement of his death was found dated one day before his body was discovered in his prison cell. These details emerge from documents released by the US Department of Justice. The draft statement from the Attorney for the Southern District of New York was dated August 9, 2019, whereas Epstein was officially found dead on the morning of August 10. The draft stated that the Manhattan Correctional Center had already confirmed the financier's death. However, prison logs and official reports indicate that only on the morning of August 10 did an employee distributing breakfast discover Epstein showing no signs of life. The following day, the medical examiner's report concluded the cause of death was suicide.
Draft (?) statements
The published plan is at least one of 23 documents characterized as draft statements from the Southern District of New York prosecutor's office. Analysis of the archives revealed multiple versions with similar content, featuring varying degrees of editing and redaction of personal data. According to a report from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, serious violations were recorded at the institution in the days preceding Epstein's death. Specifically, on August 9, his cellmate was transferred elsewhere, no new cellmate was assigned, and mandatory nightly checks and prisoner counts were essentially not performed. Meanwhile, official duty logs were later found to have been falsified. Investigation data also mentions an unidentified figure captured by surveillance cameras on the evening of August 9, near the level where Epstein's cell was located. In various reports, this figure is described as a possible cellmate or an employee moving laundry or bedding. Previously, the FBI had identified an "orange figure" on video near Epstein's cell on the night of his death.
Epstein's greatest secret remains hidden
The eyes of the collective West, wide with surprise at discovering its so-called elite is a group of perverts, represent an unsuccessful attempt to put a good face on a disgusting game. It is a pure lie to say "we knew nothing" when there are daily reports of victims losing consciousness after being drugged. You don't have to look far for examples. A senator in the upper house of the French Parliament decided to celebrate his election victory by drugging a colleague's drink in the lower house. The perpetrator was not imprisoned, receiving only a suspended sentence. While the public continued to profess ignorance, in the same France, the Lille prosecutor's office charged ten men with gang rape. Their victim was a five-year-old boy, drugged for their pedophilic orgy. Earlier, the same circles were obsessed with the relationship between a 15-year-old student and his 40-year-old teacher, insisting it was a "very high relationship" rather than a criminal offense—a reference to Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Trogneux.
No comparison
Of course, the perverts of Lille, like the figures in the Macron case, lacked even a millionth of the financial influence and political weight of those participating in Jeffrey Epstein's debauchery. The mores of the global elite allowed them to act without the slightest shame. They associated with whomever they pleased and made money with Epstein.
What Epstein actually offered
Epstein, a high school algebra teacher without a degree, entered the upper social circles by catering to their vices while satisfying his own perverted appetites. It is exactly this sexualization of events spanning over thirty years that draws in a shocked public. But it is not just about orgies and destroyed lives. Despite millions of published letters, we still do not know where the criminal Epstein obtained his wealth. His lifestyle suggested a fortune of at least half a billion dollars. Where did a math teacher get this? Who paid him hundreds of millions, and for what, if he lacked even a university education? It is safe to assume Epstein's fortune came from payments to maintain the disgusting secrets of the elites who monopolized the media. After the American elite, Europeans must take center stage—specifically those controlling financial flows and banking transactions on both sides of the Atlantic. These individuals have a name, or rather, a surname that appears regularly in Epstein's messages: Rothschild.
The role of the Rothschilds
We are talking about the Rothschilds, specifically Baroness Ariane de Rothschild. She sits at the helm of an empire over two hundred years old. It doesn't matter what the bank is named or where it is located. What matters is that these bankers call the top officials of any European state directly, bypassing secretaries. They have appointed—and continue to appoint—ministers, prime ministers, and presidents who previously worked for them, such as Georges Pompidou and Emmanuel Macron. Or lawyer Nicolas Sarkozy, whose firm had an exclusive contract to represent Rothschild interests. Baroness de Rothschild, with a fortune of five billion dollars, was not ashamed to maintain such a close relationship with Epstein that he knew about her daughters' lives and her medical appointments. Heading a powerful empire with assets worth hundreds of billions of Swiss francs, the Baroness was Epstein's financial anchor.
An untouched stable
The global criminal octopus, which has destroyed the foundations of a normal worldview using money to elevate human flaws, has not lost a single tentacle in the Epstein scandal. The private de Rothschild bank remained intact. No statements, no explanations. Money of this caliber prefers silence.
www.bankingnews.gr
Σχόλια αναγνωστών